Army-Navy E Award Winners
- gpw_42
- Sergeant Major of the Gee
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location:
Army-Navy E Award Winners
Recently, the recipients of Army-Navy E Awards came up as a topic in a different thread. Finding little to no info on the G, I found this site: https://www.usautoindustryworldwartwo.c ... Awards.htm which has a scan of a 1945 document listing all the different recipients of the E-Awards, arranged by state.
Criteria for the Army-Navy E Award:
"Quality and quantity of production in the light of available facilities are the factors which will be given the greatest weight in selecting recipients of the award. Other factors to be weighed may include-
a. Overcoming of production obstacles.
b. Low rate of absenteeism.
c. Avoidance of work stoppages.
d. Maintenance of fair labor standards.
e. Training of additional labor forces.
f. Effective management.
g. Record on accidents, health, sanitation, and plant protection.
h. Utilization of subcontracting facilities
i. Cooperation between management and labor as it affected production and
j. Conservation of critical and strategic materials."
Approximately 5 percent of plants doing work for the War or Navy Departments were recognized with Army-Navy E (or Army A or Navy E). That 5 percent represents 4,283 plants, which shows a little of the scope of wartime production - there were around 85,660 plants doing work for the war effort.
Below are some charts with different categories of manufacturers and the number of E awards they received. This is TOTALLY non-scientific, non-comprehensive, incomplete and reflective of MY INTERESTS. The most comprehensive section is the hand tool manufacturers, but even that is not complete, as some of you will undoubtedly find on your first review.
Comments:
- it's surprising to me which of the big name tool manufacturers did not earn an E award (Barcalo, BHM, D-I, Fairmount, S-K, Plumb, Vlchek, etc.), while others did (Crescent, Moore Drop Forge, New Britian, Plvmb, etc.).
- these E awards were big time advertising "bona fides" during the war, for any manufacturer who earned one or more awards.
- any attempt to be truly comprehensive would require a lot of effort to deep dive on big manufacturers. Examples: Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, GM, and maybe the Plvmb empire, as these big companies had plants in several states, where we might not think of them. I was surprised to find GM mentioned in New England, for example. Or Ford produced the GPW in CA, TX, KY and MI, to be G503-focused. Did all of those plants earn an E award, or none, or only some? I haven't gone that far into this. Yet.
- the scope of war production is staggering...of course. The more I learn about it, the more intriguing it gets.
Criteria for the Army-Navy E Award:
"Quality and quantity of production in the light of available facilities are the factors which will be given the greatest weight in selecting recipients of the award. Other factors to be weighed may include-
a. Overcoming of production obstacles.
b. Low rate of absenteeism.
c. Avoidance of work stoppages.
d. Maintenance of fair labor standards.
e. Training of additional labor forces.
f. Effective management.
g. Record on accidents, health, sanitation, and plant protection.
h. Utilization of subcontracting facilities
i. Cooperation between management and labor as it affected production and
j. Conservation of critical and strategic materials."
Approximately 5 percent of plants doing work for the War or Navy Departments were recognized with Army-Navy E (or Army A or Navy E). That 5 percent represents 4,283 plants, which shows a little of the scope of wartime production - there were around 85,660 plants doing work for the war effort.
Below are some charts with different categories of manufacturers and the number of E awards they received. This is TOTALLY non-scientific, non-comprehensive, incomplete and reflective of MY INTERESTS. The most comprehensive section is the hand tool manufacturers, but even that is not complete, as some of you will undoubtedly find on your first review.
Comments:
- it's surprising to me which of the big name tool manufacturers did not earn an E award (Barcalo, BHM, D-I, Fairmount, S-K, Plumb, Vlchek, etc.), while others did (Crescent, Moore Drop Forge, New Britian, Plvmb, etc.).
- these E awards were big time advertising "bona fides" during the war, for any manufacturer who earned one or more awards.
- any attempt to be truly comprehensive would require a lot of effort to deep dive on big manufacturers. Examples: Chrysler, Dodge, Ford, GM, and maybe the Plvmb empire, as these big companies had plants in several states, where we might not think of them. I was surprised to find GM mentioned in New England, for example. Or Ford produced the GPW in CA, TX, KY and MI, to be G503-focused. Did all of those plants earn an E award, or none, or only some? I haven't gone that far into this. Yet.
- the scope of war production is staggering...of course. The more I learn about it, the more intriguing it gets.
- Ez8
- G-Second Lieutenant
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:01 pm
- Location: Indiana, United States
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
Speaking as a modern manufacturing professional I'm extremely interested in this topic. A lot of these "production E" requirements are the same as what we strive for in our operation, but no one is giving us an award except ourselves. Happy to see Ross Gear in Lafayette IN on there - the plant is still there only it's called ZF now.
MB# 215159 D.O.D 2-25-43
Build Thread: viewtopic.php?f=96&t=209632
Build Thread: viewtopic.php?f=96&t=209632
- zepher11
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:37 pm
- Location: The Real Northern CalifornIA
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
That's pretty fascinating. I have a couple of the "E" pennants, and a couple of the sterling silver "E" pins. I'm always keeping an eye out in old WWII era factory photos to see if I can spot one of the pennants.
Thanks for posting the information. Seems like it was a big deal during the war:
Thanks for posting the information. Seems like it was a big deal during the war:
-
- G-Command Sergeant Major
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:59 am
- Location: Oakland, CA
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
GPW_42, thanks for this, and I found it quite interesting. Makes me curious about the award evaluators and objectivity involved. (Since there could be money to be made by a manufacturer receiving the award, how about side deals involved?)
Curious if all manufacturers regardless of size were judged equally or adjustments made? Also noted only 5% qualified, meaning 95% did not. There seems to be a lot of factors and criteria to explore. Looking forward to whatever else you determine.
Happy and healthy Christmas etc. and New Years to all,
Eddie
Curious if all manufacturers regardless of size were judged equally or adjustments made? Also noted only 5% qualified, meaning 95% did not. There seems to be a lot of factors and criteria to explore. Looking forward to whatever else you determine.
Happy and healthy Christmas etc. and New Years to all,
Eddie
V/r Eddie
1942 GPW #5739 "Sentimental Reasons"
MVPA & MVCC
1942 GPW #5739 "Sentimental Reasons"
MVPA & MVCC
- d42jeep
- G-Brigadier General
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:06 pm
- Location: Albany/Fallen Leaf Lake, CA
- Contact:
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
Great thread. I happened onto this article while I was poking around the Internet.
https://www.history.navy.mil/research/l ... html#press
-Don
https://www.history.navy.mil/research/l ... html#press
-Don
Ford GPW 76344 DOD 11/42 Built in Richmond, CA
- Hartofoak
- G-Major
- Posts: 937
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:06 pm
- Location: Berkshire England
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
Here are a few images of E Award adverts that I've collected over the years. Neither Walworth nor Camillus is listed but the adverts include a pennant. Not sure about the underware but it's a nice image!
Last edited by Hartofoak on Mon Dec 21, 2020 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MB 298781 DoD: est. 01-19-44 (ex British Army 1958)
T1 Trailer: "Transportation Equipment Co."
MVMTS toolboxes & tools
T1 Trailer: "Transportation Equipment Co."
MVMTS toolboxes & tools
- d42jeep
- G-Brigadier General
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:06 pm
- Location: Albany/Fallen Leaf Lake, CA
- Contact:
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
I found this photo online.
-Don
-Don
Ford GPW 76344 DOD 11/42 Built in Richmond, CA
-
- G-Command Sergeant Major
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:59 am
- Location: Oakland, CA
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
Don, thanks for the post. Answered some of my questions. It does, however, look like a bureaucratic nightmare for a company who felt eligible for the award and was not awarded. 95% is a big number. Looking forward to more on this.
Best, Eddie
Best, Eddie
V/r Eddie
1942 GPW #5739 "Sentimental Reasons"
MVPA & MVCC
1942 GPW #5739 "Sentimental Reasons"
MVPA & MVCC
- gpw_42
- Sergeant Major of the Gee
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location:
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
Thanks all for the participation and follow-on discussion. Cliff and Don, you posted some of the advertising I thought about while writing the first post, and didn't have time to run down. Cliff, I found Camillus listed, with 3 stars (so 4 awards) on the "New York, North Carolina" page; I think this shows a pitfall of the organization of that website, having to break up some large states (like NY) onto multiple pages. Also, I added them to my "miscellaneous" chart, but haven't updated the first post.Ed Roberts wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 3:59 pmDon, thanks for the post. Answered some of my questions. It does, however, look like a bureaucratic nightmare for a company who felt eligible for the award and was not awarded. 95% is a big number. Looking forward to more on this. Best, Eddie
I'm curious to attempt to dig into some of what Eddie and Ez8 addressed about how companies were nominated. The details are on the link which Don posted (which is a transcription of the document linked in my initial post); that transcription is MUCH easier to read than the scan! In short, it was on the Armed Services to nominate a factory for the E-award, based on the criteria pasted into the first post. However, my suspicion is that enterprising and aggressive plant leadership would "make it easy for" the military officer(s) to submit a packet. How widespread was this? I have no clue, but it seems that the advertising benefit would be worth assembling a packet for the procurement (Army) or inspection (Navy) people.
I'm also really surprised about the emphasis placed on fair labor and management/labor cooperation, in the award criteria. Of course, the USG wanted plants producing, not involved in labor issues, so it was in Uncle Sam's favor to encourage the two to work together.
Last edited by gpw_42 on Tue Dec 22, 2020 2:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
- gpw_42
- Sergeant Major of the Gee
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location:
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
This chart lists the automotive companies and plants which received E-awards: https://www.usautoindustryworldwartwo.c ... inners.htm It's too long to copy/paste here, but well worth your time to review, someone has already done a big part of the "deep dive" I mentioned in the initial post. But especially take a look at the GM entries (I'm a Dodge guy, for what it's worth) for the breadth of the GM manufacturing effort.
Zeph, I found a page recently which has an E award presentation ceremony broken up into several sound clipshttp://industrialhistory.org/histories/the-army-navy-e-award-world-war-2/
And here's a YT video of John Deere receiving an E award, in 1942: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4U19l-uXi8
Picked up these souvenirs of Wartime production recently. The Army-Navy E pins and the Navy E pin for Carnegie Illinois (steel manufacturing) were yesterday. The Bullard pennant came earlier this month, with the pins attached; it was billed as a pennant for a 2nd shift worker. I was attracted to the it because Bullard made the vertical turret lathe which has been on the USS NORTH CAROLINA since the ship was built. I like the Navy E pin because it's not generic - the specific plant it was made for is part of the pin; the Army-Navy E pins are generic. I'd like to obtain at least one of the Army E pins, to display alongside the Navy and Army-Navy pins.
Zeph, I found a page recently which has an E award presentation ceremony broken up into several sound clipshttp://industrialhistory.org/histories/the-army-navy-e-award-world-war-2/
And here's a YT video of John Deere receiving an E award, in 1942: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4U19l-uXi8
Picked up these souvenirs of Wartime production recently. The Army-Navy E pins and the Navy E pin for Carnegie Illinois (steel manufacturing) were yesterday. The Bullard pennant came earlier this month, with the pins attached; it was billed as a pennant for a 2nd shift worker. I was attracted to the it because Bullard made the vertical turret lathe which has been on the USS NORTH CAROLINA since the ship was built. I like the Navy E pin because it's not generic - the specific plant it was made for is part of the pin; the Army-Navy E pins are generic. I'd like to obtain at least one of the Army E pins, to display alongside the Navy and Army-Navy pins.
- zepher11
- G-Lieutenant General
- Posts: 4357
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:37 pm
- Location: The Real Northern CalifornIA
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
Now that's a neat clip. I don't know why, but I have always been fascinated with the ramped up production during the war. One can see it was a big deal, but it seems like the "E" production awards program has been somewhat lost to history now. I have a lot of ads like those above on my garage wall with the "E" flags depicted on the advertisement.gpw_42 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 2:54 am...
Zeph, I found a page recently which has an E award presentation ceremony broken up into several sound clipshttp://industrialhistory.org/histories/the-army-navy-e-award-world-war-2/
And here's a YT video of John Deere receiving an E award, in 1942: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4U19l-uXi8...
-
- Sergeant Major of the Gee
- Posts: 388
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:18 am
- Location: San Antonio, Texas
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
Regarding war production and going in the opposite direction for a moment, take a moment to watch the 15 minute Periscope film on THE AFTERMATH OF WORLD WAR II PRODUCTION HISTORIC FILM 74642.. Pretty amazing to imagine all that manufacturing coming to a screeching halt with companies changing their production so as to be able to remain in business in a post-war world.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoAsDmTnhpE
Enjoy!
GPW1263
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoAsDmTnhpE
Enjoy!
GPW1263
-
- G-General
- Posts: 16666
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 3:40 pm
- Location: Fort Myers, Florida
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
The emphasis on labor relations was because of what happened in WW 1. Imagine that during WW 2
https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.n ... ers%20each.
Headed it off somewhat
https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/en ... rld-war-ii
https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.n ... ers%20each.
Headed it off somewhat
https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/en ... rld-war-ii
Stand for the Flag, Kneel for the Cross Psalm 55; 9-11
- gpw_42
- Sergeant Major of the Gee
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:18 pm
- Location:
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
Cliff, thanks for sharing those ads! They add to this thread, and help illustrate my point about advertising value.
Here's a link to Walworth, with 4 stars (5 awards), about 1/2 way down page 28: https://www.usautoindustryworldwartwo.c ... page-5.htm Assuming they made correct size pipe wrenches for GMTKs, that's a useful brand to be aware of when searching the flea/boot for GMTK tools.
Camillus, about 3/4 of the way down page 43, with 3 stars: https://www.usautoindustryworldwartwo.c ... page-9.htm
Finding any particular company's info takes a bit of detective work, and is not necessarily straightforward. It's also easy to overlook...
I need to dig back into this - lost the bubble after Christmas.
Steve
- d42jeep
- G-Brigadier General
- Posts: 2290
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:06 pm
- Location: Albany/Fallen Leaf Lake, CA
- Contact:
Re: Army-Navy E Award Winners
That’s good information about Walworth. Due to the ease of dating, both of my keeper sets exclusively have Walco pipe wrenches. I think Len has a nice collection of them too.
-Don
-Don
Ford GPW 76344 DOD 11/42 Built in Richmond, CA
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests