BATFE compliant aluminum receiver question

Demilitarized vehicle weapons and static display accessories
Post Reply
User avatar
Quest Master
G-Colonel
G-Colonel
Posts: 1796
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 5:33 am
Location:
Contact:

BATFE compliant aluminum receiver question

Post by Quest Master » Mon Jan 17, 2022 10:44 am

I've seen solid aluminum dummy receivers for dummy guns like the STEN, MP-40 etc. for years. I don't see any problem there, but I've seen aluminum sideplates for the Maxim, M2 .50 cal. etc being offered recently. Is it BATFE compliant to build a dummy gun on an aluminum right side plate of the same dimensions? Doesn't seen legal to me.
Thanks,
Van
Kosovo, Afghanistan (x2) and Iraq Campaign Veteran
"If the DUKW was introduced in 1944 it would have been called a FUKW."
45 GMC DUKW (105mm)
42 Ford GPW
44 Willys MB
44 Clark CA-1
43 Studebaker T-24
42 Harley WLA
44 Cushman 53
42 Willys MBT
44 Columbia F-92L
43 Huffman G-519


Don Shaffer
G-Sergeant Major
G-Sergeant Major
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:17 am
Location:

Re: BATFE compliant aluminum receiver question

Post by Don Shaffer » Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:19 am

The Aluminum Receivers I have seen have a raised rib cast on the inside so original parts won't fit ! Check before you Buy ! Don Shaffer N.E. Ohio

User avatar
W. Winget
LTC, U.S. Army
LTC, U.S. Army
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 10:37 am
Location: USA, Virginia, Carrollton
Contact:

Re: BATFE compliant aluminum receiver question

Post by W. Winget » Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:22 pm

The other consideration is the cycling of an Automatic firing piece and the effects of steel parts cycling under extreme pressures will render the aluminum pieces out of tolerance fairly quickly...so the amount of machining work put into an aluminum side plate that 'could' function for a short duration wouldn't be a real issue. It might not even stand up to the testing and functioning phase of assembly.
Yeah, some .45's and pistols like Walthers P1's have had aluminum frames for years, but that's a sliding back and forth mechanism, not a guide down, and guide up type of action the Maxim would incur.
Just a thought.
V/R W Winget
Looking for 1918 Standard B 'Liberty' truck parts

Andy Cole
Sergeant Major of the Gee
Sergeant Major of the Gee
Posts: 474
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:36 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: BATFE compliant aluminum receiver question

Post by Andy Cole » Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:35 am

From my understanding, having built a couple of semi belt feds, IF it is assembled and unmodified full auto internals will fit and fire one round it is considered a machine gun.

I for one WOULD NOT chance it. Material aside, it makes no difference. 13 years ago when I got my first torch cut belt fed kit, it still had sections of the right side plate attached. Even though a large chunk was missing from the side plate, the bolt could still cycle. I have no idea when it was cut originally, but had not been "de-miled" to ATF specs on the books at the time I acquired it. I didn't know better, until a very reputable Class III dealer informed me that as it sat it was contraband. It was immediately dismantled and the right side plate destroyed per ATF guidelines.

Thankfully I was later able to build the then legal kit into a beautiful and legal Semi-auto 1917a1. That gun is what started me down the rabbit hole of semi-auto belt feds.
1943 Willys MB285433 D.O.D. 12-3-1943
1951 M100 trailer D.O.D. 3/51
1951 M37 Truck D.O.D. 5-28-1951
M3 37MM ATG
M3A4 Hand Cart
Wife D.O.Delivery 7-21-1979
Boy D.O.Delivery. 2-15-2007
Girl D.O.Delivery. 4-9-2009
Girl D.O.Delivery. 10-23-2012

Loganr
G-Captain
G-Captain
Posts: 714
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 6:48 pm
Location:

Re: BATFE compliant aluminum receiver question

Post by Loganr » Wed Jan 19, 2022 5:26 pm

I saw that web site the steel 80% plates have the 1/2 inch
Dummy island
The aluminum no but looks Un drilled and some machining
So he might get by selling it as is because it can not be fitted but if you finish it then who knows.
If he’s honest he will send you a copy of the BATF
Approval letter.
I think he’s right up there with solvent traps but I could be wrong


Post Reply

Return to “Weapons”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests